Frequently Asked Questions

Costs vary by site and finish. A basic framed crushed-stone court typically ranges widely depending on excavation, base work, and access. Request a written estimate that lists base, drainage, and surfacing items for a clear total.

For recreational play, a compacted crushed-stone wearing layer gives consistent rolls and low maintenance. Acrylic or synthetic options exist but need different base designs and drainage considerations.

A layered base typically includes 150mm drainage gravel, geotextile where needed, and a 50–75mm compacted crushed-stone wearing course for stability and true rolling.

Ignoring drainage leads to standing water, aggregate washout, and surface softening. Repairs and regrading can cost a large portion of the original build and shorten usable life.

Delaying base preparation risks uneven settlement and recurring corrections. Fixing a settled court often costs 20–40% of a new installation and extends downtime before play resumes.

A DIY approach with ordinary gravel or pavers often yields inconsistent rolls and drainage issues. A specified layered base and compacted crushed-stone wearing course are necessary for reliable play.

Cost depends on surface type, base prep, and square footage. Modular tiles usually cost less to install than seam-welded sheet vinyl. Get a site assessment and written estimate listing base, surfacing, and line work for an accurate figure.

Not always. Interlocking tiles often float without adhesive, while sheet vinyl is usually glued or welded at seams. Choice depends on traffic, load, and permanence preferences noted in the written plan.

DIY is possible for small interlocking-tile projects, but substrate prep, seam welding, and cove base often require professional skills to avoid gaps and trip hazards.

Loose seams worsen with use and create trip hazards. Repair costs rise as damage spreads; early repair avoids full replacement and limits downtime for the facility.

A level, compacted base or subfloor with recommended underlay ensures shock absorption and prevents movement. We document base depth and prep in the site assessment and written estimate.

Delaying increases injury risk from poor shock absorption and may lead to costly repairs from moisture or substrate damage. Upgrading on schedule preserves equipment life and reduces long-term maintenance.

Costs depend on framing, glass, surfacing, and lighting choices. Enclosed courts with tempered glass and engineered steel framing are the main cost drivers. Plan for higher costs if permits or tight access add handling or foundation work.

Frame damage worsens over time, increasing repair scope and safety risk. Emergency glass replacement and frame repairs often cost 20–30% more than planned maintenance and extend downtime for the court.

Worn turf causes uneven bounce and increases injury risk. Delaying replacement can require larger sections to be removed and relaid, raising labour and material costs compared with scheduled resurfacing.

Typical builds start with an engineered base, anchoring steel framing, fitting tempered glass walls, installing surfacing and lighting, then precision line marking for regulation play.

Ownership can be profitable if usage and pricing cover maintenance and renewals. Profitability depends on location demand, operating hours, and surfacing longevity rather than the court type alone.

The 40-40 rule refers to a scoring scenario during match play where both teams reach 40 points. It does not affect construction but is relevant for players using regulation courts.

Costs vary by size, base work, contouring and turf grade. Get a written estimate listing base depth, drainage, turf quality, and cup installation for an accurate price.

Standing water washes out base material, separates turf, and creates uneven rolls. Repairs after failure often cost several times the price of proper drainage installed early.

Improper compaction or contouring causes settlement and inconsistent roll; poor drainage leads to turf lifting. Rebuilding a failed base can cost substantially more than correct installation.

Kits exist, but achieving true roll needs engineered base compaction, contour shaping, and correct cup fitting. A site assessment helps match a kit to your yard.

We remove turf, excavate to the specified depth, install drainage layer, shape contours, compact base to spec, then lay turf and fit cups.

Most greens are playable immediately or within a day; final checks, net setup, or specific adhesives may add a short wait. Timeline is noted in the estimate.

Algae and organic buildup reduce traction and hide surface defects. Over time this leads to larger repairs or resurfacing rather than simple cleaning. Early removal keeps the court safe and limits repair scope.

Delaying inspections lets small cracks and equipment wear worsen. That can force emergency closures and more extensive repairs. An annual check identifies issues while they are cheaper to fix.

Household detergents and incorrect PSI can streak or remove acrylic coatings. Use surface-safe detergents and PSI matched to your court material to avoid damage.

We recommend an annual inspection and cleaning as a baseline. High-use or shaded courts may need additional visits to remove algae and maintain traction.

A report lists wear areas, algae or stain locations, equipment condition, photos, and a prioritised maintenance plan with recommended next steps.

Sealant reduces UV damage and slows fading but does not stop it entirely. Periodic reapplication and correct product selection help maintain colour and surface integrity.

Small cracks let water and heat cycles reach the base, widening defects and causing delamination. Repairs become more extensive and costly if delayed, sometimes requiring base rebuilds instead of simple filler work.

Delayed sealing allows water to enter joints and erode the base. That leads to sinking, uneven play, and repairs that can cost several times more than early intervention.

Many DIY fillers are not formulated for court thermal movement or UV exposure and can crack again. Professional-grade epoxy or polymer-modified fillers are specified to match court conditions.

Most localized crack and patch repairs can be completed in one to three days, depending on area size and cure times for fillers and paints.

We use texture restoration and color blending to minimise visible patchwork. Perfect invisibility isn’t always possible, but consistent texture and matched paint reduce contrast significantly.

We inspect for soft spots, sinking, and water entry. If hidden damage exists, we list it in the written estimate and outline repair options and costs before work begins.

Cracks let water and debris reach the base, causing widening and base failure. Repairs later often cost many times an early crack rout and seal. Early inspection and routing prevent deeper substrate damage and extend the surface lifespan.

Delaying lets UV, dust, and water worsen wear. That can lead to larger repairs, longer downtime, and higher costs when resurfacing is finally done. A timely overlay preserves the base and keeps lines usable.

Most resurfacing jobs finish within 3–7 days depending on prep, crack repairs, and humidity. Complex base repairs add time; your written estimate lists expected duration.

Interlocking tiles install over sound asphalt or concrete but require level, well-prepared bases. Severe base deterioration must be repaired first to prevent uneven tiles and seam movement.

No. Proper resurfacing includes inspection, crack routing, leveling, and either acrylic coatings or modular overlay. Line repainting alone ignores base issues and often fails sooner.

We specify and document surface profile, cleaning, crack treatment, and primer steps in the scope. Clear prep requirements reduce the risk of overlay delamination.